AI information

I've been making up my own MMS for the last week, and am learning as much about it as I can. I've been using AI to try and inform me, and know that some of the information is either wrong or biased. But some information I have received, I have no idea whether it is accurate or not, or whether it needs to be framed better. For example, Google Gemini told me:

"ClO2 cannot distinguish between the cell membrane of a harmful pathogen and the membrane of a human stomach lining cell, kidney cell, or red blood cell. It damages or destroys whatever organic tissue it contacts first. [whereas] antibiotics like penicillin can kill 99.9% of bacteria at doses that cause zero harm to human cells, creating a wide, safe therapeutic window."

It occurs to me that some antibiotics can kill good gut bacteria, but we take it anyway. And chemotherapy is a largely indiscriminate treatment. So is Gemini's statement true or false, does it really matter, or does it just need context?

ianaccount2 wrote:

I've been making up my own MMS for the last week, and am learning as much about it as I can. I've been using AI to try and inform me, and know that some of the information is either wrong or biased. But some information I have received, I have no idea whether it is accurate or not, or whether it needs to be framed better. For example, Google Gemini told me:

"ClO2 cannot distinguish between the cell membrane of a harmful pathogen and the membrane of a human stomach lining cell, kidney cell, or red blood cell. It damages or destroys whatever organic tissue it contacts first. [whereas] antibiotics like penicillin can kill 99.9% of bacteria at doses that cause zero harm to human cells, creating a wide, safe therapeutic window."

It occurs to me that some antibiotics can kill good gut bacteria, but we take it anyway. And chemotherapy is a largely indiscriminate treatment. So is Gemini's statement true or false, does it really matter, or does it just need context?

I got a more complete answer for your question using the AI bot at Brave search. I would never use Google search! 

"The selectivity that makes ClO₂ effective at low concentrations is size-based, not membrane-based. A 2013 study in PLOS ONE ("Chlorine Dioxide Is a Size-Selective Antimicrobial Agent") demonstrated that because bacteria are orders of magnitude smaller than human cells, ClO₂ penetrates and accumulates to lethal concentrations inside a microbe far faster than it can inside a human cell. In other words, the pathogen is killed before the oxidant has time to build up to damaging levels in the much larger human cell." 

References
Chlorine Dioxide Is a Size-Selective Antimicrobial Agent
Introduction · The answer suggested in the Results section is the following: the selectivity between humans or animals and microbes is based not on their different biochemistry, but on their different…

journals.plos.org
______________________________________

A Cornerstone of Health - by GingerRRT - The Lost Lessons
Chlorine Dioxide › CD has two functions with pathogens; · 1. one is that is oxidizes the pathogen itself, and the · 2. second is that it oxidizes the toxins released by the pathogens while they are living, dead, or dyin ...

lostlessons.substack.com  

If you follow approved CLO2 protocols, you should not have any issues. 

If you read some of the thousands of CLO2 testimonials  over the past 20 years or so, you would learn how safe CLO2 can be. No one who has used CLO2 has ever died from CLO2 itself. 

Why did NASA say in 1987 that CLO2 was "The Universal Antidote"?